Dubai, 911 - Disturbing Evidence - CGI - Pod was not added to Plane - Plane was added to Pod - 911 - 1
Dubai videos | Buildings | Information | History | Emirates | View
911 - Disturbing Evidence - CGI - Pod was not added to Plane - Plane was added to Pod - 911 - 1 urban MOving SyStems incorporAteD [MOSSAD] the van with the mural on the side showing a civilian airline flying into the World Trade Center - the van was full of explosives. Scott DeCarlo of the New Jersey Police Department arrested the 5 Dancing Israelis who were celebrating the success of the demolition of the World Trade Center in New York - the Israelis asserted they went to New York "in order to document the event [of the blowing up of the WTC Twin Towers WTC1 (North Tower), WTC2 (South Tower) & WTC7 & the Pentagon (caused by CIA {US} and MOSSAD {Israel}]. CONSPIRACY - when 2 or more persons agree to commit a criminal offence or civil wrong CORRUPTION - Impairment of Integrity COMPLICITY COLLUSION HIGH TREASON - until the untimely demise of the late Princess Diana in the Pont de d'Alma road tunnel in Paris in August 1997 the penalty for High Treason was DEATH - the name of the Police Operation into the Investigation of the death was 'Operation PAGET' - why? The SECRET is simple - senior Police of the Met Police knew the real reason - yet as Agents of the Crown - some individuals under the British Constitution can in law - 'Do NO Wrong' - it links with the full name 'Harry Paget FLASHMAN' In other words, as the witnesses asserted to us [a bright flash was seen in the tunnel immediately BEFORE the driver of the car (M. Henri PAUL) lost control] the causation of her death was in reality the FLASH-MAN - not the driver [remember the video footage of the driver immediately before going out to drive the car - he looked as sober as a judge - yet the late driver was to carry liability/responsibility for the whole crash]. Richard TOMLINSON (ex MI6/SIS) in 'The Big Breach' will help us in the evidence, as this means of using an Anti Personnel Device ('APD') as the Modus Operandi ('MO') to ensure a Road Traffic Accident ('RTA') and in the process 'take out' [a euphemism for killing] the late Princess. [For the RTA to be initiated in another sovereign jurisdiction would give the impression that the British authorities could not be connected with any such event - as the RTA and resulting death took place on the sovereign jurisdiction of France not the UK. [Deviously Clever!] [Remember the untimely death of the late Dr David Kelly in July 2003, the name of the investigation of his death was 'Operation Mason' as in 'Operation Freemason'. (Who was to Benefit?)(Was it not the PM?) Remember the untimely death of the distinguished idealistic Foreign Secretary Robin F. Cook - he was against the war in Iraq - he was found DEAD up a mountain {Ben Stack} in Scotland in August 2005 - he was against the war in Iraq (Who was to Benefit?)(Was it not the PM?) Remember the untimely death of the Michael J. Todd QPM (Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police) - found DEAD in March 2008 up Mount Snowdon - highest mountain in Wales in 2008 - he investigated on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers the extraordinary rendition flights conducted by the CIA to transport detainees (Who was to Benefit?)(Was it not the PM?) Remember the untimely death in May 1987 of P/S Barry Manakee on his motorbike [getting too close to the late Princess Diana (certain people were they not very concerned)]. Remember the untimely death of George Anthony Smith (footman to the late princess Diana) he asserted he had been raped by Michael Fawcett the very favoured footman of Prince Charles. [George Smith was to be the victim of an untimely death in August 2005].
Comments
-
Only shit ppl .... porks.... rats .... brainwashed.... Ppl who goes to church
Can't see this is a fucking false flag ..... just it's impossible was a plane .... and impossible all happens after .....
But ofc..... in 2017 we still have shit disgusting brainwashed ppl who believes in Jesus ... bible .... Noah ark..... the create of everything in 6 days ...... ohhhh dammed !!!! Ggggrrrrrr fucking porks pigs -
In regard to Flight 175, The anomalies in the images of flight 175 can be partially explained by physics. The plane was severely banked when it hit the south tower. If the plane had been flying parallel to the ground, it would have hit approximately 4 stories of the building. Instead, the plane struck the 77th 85th floors on impact, destroying 9 floors. The World Trade Center Building Performance Study; Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, & Recommendations, conducted by the FEMA states that flight 175 hit the building with the left wing at a downward angle of approximately 38 degrees. In addition, flight 175 approached the tower not head-on, but at a lateral angle of approximately 15 degrees clockwise of the towers south wall. As a result, images taken from below or from the south side of the south tower should indeed show a distortion of the right wing in comparison to the left. The effect would be similar to taking a photograph from below of a windmill at different moments in its rotation-depending on the angle of the arms, one arm would look longer & differently proportioned than the other.
One of the clearest, most widely seen pictures of the doomed jet's undercarriage was taken by photographer Rob Howard & published in New York magazine & elsewhere. Popular Mechanics sent a digital scan of the original photo to Ronald Greeley, director of the Space Photography Laboratory at Arizona State University in Tempe. Greeley who has serves on a number of NASA committees, is an expert at analyzing images to determine the shape & features of geological formations based on shadow & light effects. After studying the high-resolution image & comparing it to photos of a Boeing 767-200ER's undercarriage, Greeley dismissed the notion that the Howard photo reveals a "pod." In fact, Greeley confirms the photo reveals only the Boeing's right fairing, a pronounced bulge that contains the landing gear. "I conclude," he writes in an e-mail to Popular Mechanics, "that it is an artifact by lighting caused by the geometry of the aircraft & the angle of the sun & camera, causing the feature to result from the sun glint. Such a glint causes a blossoming (enlargement) on film, which tends to be amplified in digital versions of images-the pixels are saturated & tend to "spill over" to adjacent pixels."
Thomas R. Edwards, cofounder of TREC, a Huntsville, Alabama company that analyzes images for law-enforcement agencies, reviewed several images of Flight 175 as presented on conspiracy Web sites & sees further problems. "The images passed around the Web are digital data." Edwards tells Popular Mechanics, "You can copy them without loss (of resolution). But when you take an analog image-the bottom of the barrel, as far as resolution is concerned-& start messing around with it in the digital world by enlarging it or sizing it to fit on a certain page, you have to be very careful of what you are doing. Digital magnification by classic techniques gets highly pixilated at times two & beyond. The image just breaks up into squares of meaningless data, with bigger squares as the magnification zooms in closer. The (online) images you view suffer from classical digital magnification. You can draw whatever conclusions you want from a bad photograph."
Edwards who has testified in 2 dozen criminal cases, says his role in court is to evaluate the quality of images, not question another person's perception of what the image conveys. But, when pressed for an opinion about whether the photos of Flight 175 show a pod, he responds "You've got a similar situation here to the folks who think there are UFOs out in Nevada, they have photographs to substantiate their claims. Some of (the images) even look like flying saucers. The bulge on the belly of the plane is an even harder story to swallow. You wouldn't want to go to court with this, I'll tell you that."
The discussion of glints & bulges also overlooks a key fact; Thousands of horrified onlookers saw Flight 175 hit the south tower. Many of them were standing directly under the planes path. Popular Mechanics has been unable to find a single eyewitness account of missiles or ordnance attached to the plane.
Photographs aside, military & aviation experts say it is next to impossible to retrofit a passenger plane to carry weapons. "Whoever came up with that has no idea how these things work." says Fred E. C. Culick, professor of aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology. "You have to have the means for setting it off, releasing, & arming it. There are all kinds of little systems involved, (such as) connecting the mounting to the pilot. It would require allot of metalwork & wiring &, I mean, its just harebrained. Its not like throwing an extra suitcase in the car."
Finally, as part of a 3 year investigation into the collapse of the WTC, NIST a nonregulatory agency with the U.S. Department Of Commerce, ran computer simulations of the crashes & concluded the damages were consistent with the impact of the planes, not missiles or bombs. -
lol
-
So what happened to the dead passengers? Yer a fn joke. GET A LIFE, go get rich from some one else
-
Dr Hall;
Could you please explain to us did this big massive ball get
from point “A” to point “B”? was it shot out of a huge canon, was it a
controlled ball drop? Did the passengers from flight 175 toss it out the
plane,.. what? How did this huge ball get propelled with such accuracy? I mean
it didn’t have wings of sorts to guide it. What type of vehicle was used to
help lauch it in the air and be accurate? -
The "no planes " theory is a product of disinformation agents attempting to discredit the movement for 9/11 truth.
This particular one shown above is one of the more tacky examples. -
the real question is why fake everything and who profits from it?
-
I watched the news live. The second plane was clear as could be. One video that I never seen a second time was a plane that was following the river that later hit the Pentagon. It was recorded by a local who explained the circumstance of being on his balcony with the video camera.
-
The plane doesn't appear in the wide angle shot because it hasn't arrived there yet, morons!
-
Bush didn't flinch or even bother being moved to a secure location when the attack occurred. That would put everyone in that school at risk therefore why would he do that? he had foreknowledge of all of what was happening.
A bunch of Taliban living in a cave would not be able to pull off something of this magnitude and get past security the way they want you to believe.
If you use your brain you can see this for what it really is a government funded mass murder to access all the necessary reason to attack another country without question. -
A ball? Unpowered? In free fall? In a straight line and not influenced by gravity?
Hmmm! -
A ball? Unpowered? In free fall? In a straight line and not influenced by gravity?
Hmmm! -
that building the planes wing passed behind is in fact in FRONT of the world trade center building so it is expected that the wing would disappear as it passed BEHIND. As shown, the planes wings when they hit the building were atomized on impact giving the impression that they went into the building when in fact they were turned to aluminium atoms by the force of the impact.
-
bla bla bla
-
And the people who died on the planes?
-
fucking nerd...ball??? bollocks,it's a pigeon.
-
fucking nerd...ball??? bollocks,it's a pigeon.
-
kill yourself you fucking monster
-
another moron...if small planes, then what accounts for all the missing passengers...I'm just tired of the morons who are too smart to see what's in front of their eyes. The US gov't didn't do this. No LIVE TV footage was doctored. Nothing was added to the planes. No missiles were shot out of the planes before they hit the buildings. Conspiracy doesn't even begin to describe the crap spewing from this moron's mouth.
-
It's remarkable to me that a reasonably intelligent human being could believe, and, promote this sort of silly horseshit. Hundreds of people saw airplanes hit the fucking towers (probably thousands saw the second plane hit the tower). This is like the legendary - and equally insane - "moon hoax" theory. The hoaxed moon landing theory, if it were true, would have absolutely required the complicity of hundreds of thousands of people - literally. And we went to the moon six times. TWO PEOPLE can't keep a fucking secret! And, yet, this completely moronic video wants you to believe that the thousands of eyewitnesses are lying and virtually all of the videos were faked. This sort of extreme conspiratorial nonsense is like some new form of mental illness. People who promote shit like this may be intelligent, but, they are completely out of touch with the way the world actually works - and they're clinically paranoid. If you are unable to see how all of the eyewitness accounts, and, all of the video footage of the 911 attacks could NOT have been faked you are totally, completely out of your fucking mind. Do conspiracies exist? Absolutely. Did the government collude with every major media organization and every private citizen who witnessed/filmed the 911 attack to create the most involved conspiracy in the history of the universe? No. Stop making videos and go see a psychotherapist, dude.
121Rating